Over the Christmas holiday, I picked up the book "Reinventing Project Based Learning" by Suzie Krauss and Jane Boss. All this year I had been using wikis, blogs, and podcasts in my U.S. History classroom, but I wanted to know how I could more effectively utilize these in a project based manner. The book has a ton of great information in it, but what really stuck out to me was something that I read in chapter three Imagining the Possibilities. In it, the authors state the following:"What big ideas, what core concepts and processes, should students know after studying with you...A history teacher expects students to appreciate how history shapes culture and to understand the techniques of historians."Hmmm...the techniques of historians. What exactly are the techniques of historians? Was this something that was ever specifically taught and stressed to you in your history classes growing up? Should it have been?
I've been teaching American history for seven of my eleven years as an educator and in that time, I can not think of one instance in which I as a history teacher was asked to focus on teaching my students the processes and techniques of the historian. The curriculum has always focused on students learning about the people, places, and events of the past, but specifically learning the "historian's craft" has not been an expectation. When considering the future of my students I wonder which will have more intrinsic value for them, memorizing events, people, and places of the past or learning the historian's craft for themselves.
"Learning" history and "doing" history are not the same. I need to teach my students how to "do." I need to learn the techniques of the historian.
Photo by Eduardo Amorim




